opinion@cbc.ca I am writing in response to your article entitled, “’Clean’ natural gas is actually the new coal: report says” published...

Dear Gordon Laxer, I am writing in response to your article entitled, “Don’t waste any more money on the Trans Mountain pipeline”...

Projects subject to new Canadian Energy Regulator regulations.

Bill C-48 - the tanker ban - is harmful to ordinary Canadians.

Letter to the editor editor@natgeo.com Dear Stephen Leahy, This letter is in response to your article published in National Geographic on...

We need politics for the people, not for the politicians, and that’s why I believe voter engagement is critical.

premier@gov.ab.ca March 6, 2019 Dear Ms Notely, I would like to thank you for your willingness to serve in public office. It isn’t an...

September 27, 2019 Hi Jo-Ann, thank you for taking the time to provide a lengthy response to Demian’s open letter. I appreciate that you...

The four main technical reasons that I support the Line 3 Replacement Project are:

News used to be about reporting the facts, now it’s mostly opinion pieces.

February 9, 2019 Elizabeth May House of Commons Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca Dear Elizabeth May, I watched your recent...

campaign encouraging municipalities to waste limited tax-payer dollars on frivolous lawsuits against fossil fuel companies

“there is no social acceptability for a pipeline that would pass through Quebec territory”,

I am writing you to ask that you defeat Bill C-69, The Impact Assessment Act. This Bill is problematic for three main reasons

I am writing to express my frustration with your government’s continued lack of meaningful action to support the Canadian energy industry.

I have to confess – I rally because I get a rush from it. There’s an energy to the crowd, and I love it.

My first open letter.